He was however, a lecturer at National Taiwan Police College, so I guess that DOES count for something!
(Image of KMT legislator Wu Yu-Sheng from the Taiwanese Legislative Yuan website)
From Monday's Taipei Times:
A number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators criticized former
Academia Sinica president [and Nobel Prize winner] Lee Yuan-tseh (李遠哲) yesterday over Lee’s remark that local enterprises offered more money to the KMT’s presidential candidates than they did to those from the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP).
KMT Legislator Wu Yu-sheng (吳育昇) called Lee’s remark “ridiculous” and “pointless.”
“[The remark shows] he did not deserve the Nobel Prize [in chemistry] and he failed Taiwan and its people,” Wu said. [emphasis added]
Wu might want to remind himself that while politicians may win their seats through their expertise at excitable windbaggery, people usually win Nobel Prizes in chemistry for their contributions to the science of chemistry — not for their political opinions.
Lee's comment is a simply verifiable claim, one way or the other. If Taiwan has a transparent political donation system (which may be a big IF), the numbers can be crunched and Lee's hypothesis proven . . . or disproven.
As for Wu's assertion — that Lee doesn't deserve the Nobel Prize in chemistry — that too, can be simply verified. All Wu has to do is peruse Lee's entire published body of chemical research, and demonstrate in an empirical manner where Lee got it all wrong.
Should be a piece of cake — for even the most dim-witted individual with an advanced degree in chemical kinetics.
UPDATE (Mar 18/09): Special thanks to the commenter who pointed out an error I made in the caption.
The mistake has (very belatedly) been corrected in the post.
i-1