8 years.
2 terms.
1 man.
A look back at President Obama's countless fist bumps. https://t.co/dM8cFdeljU pic.twitter.com/2bEmFQtVZh— CNN (@CNN) January 14, 2017
Taiwan, China, and other things. Recovered from the defunct TypePad platform.
8 years.
2 terms.
1 man.
A look back at President Obama's countless fist bumps. https://t.co/dM8cFdeljU pic.twitter.com/2bEmFQtVZh— CNN (@CNN) January 14, 2017
… a personal e-mail of former US secretary of state Hillary Rodham Clinton recently leaked by WikiLeaks suggested an adviser, Jake Sullivan, once shared with her an article titled “To save our economy, ditch Taiwan” by Paul Kane, a former international security research fellow at Harvard’s John F. Kennedy School of Government. [Emphasis added]
In the article, Kane suggested that US President Barack Obama could bolster US economic security by ending its military assistance and arms sales to Taiwan, in exchange for a write-off of US$1.14 trillion in US debt held by China.
“I saw [Paul Kane's proposal to sell out Taiwan] and thought it was so clever. Let’s discuss,” said Clinton… [Emphasis added]
The veracity of this is open to question, given Wikileaks' status as a likely Russian front group. It would therefore be helpful if America's supine press asked Secretary Clinton to confirm or deny whether it would have been the policy of her government to stab fellow democracies in the back.
Helpful, yes. But it's pretty difficult to picture this planeload of throne-sniffers ever asking the Haggard Queen any tough questions:
Find a love that looks at you the way the press looks at Hillary. pic.twitter.com/KxPXNpWl5n
— Razor (@hale_razor) September 6, 2016
Postscript: Paul Kane's from the JFK School of Government? For real?
"Let every nation know, whether it wishes us well or ill, that we shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any hardship, support any friend, oppose any foe to assure the survival and the success of liberty…Offer not applicable if one trillion dollar bribes are on the table." —John Fitzgerald Kennedy, Inaugural Address, probably
UPDATE: The original Wikileaks document. Not much different from the Taipei Times' account, though it does include Paul Kane's article in its entirety.
From the Nuremberg Laws to the Wuppertal Laws: All of this has happened before, and all this will happen again:
"A German regional court in the city of Wuppertal affirmed a lower court decision last Friday stating that a violent attempt to burn the city's synagogue by three men in 2014 was a justified expression of criticism of Israel’s policies."
"The court sentenced the three [Muslim men responsible for the arson] … to suspended sentences."
An evil fate awaits Jews in Eurabia, given the anti-Semitism of European natives and the unbridled Judenhass of the continent's new Muslim rapefugees.
Israel awaits. Best get out, while the gettin's good.
>I want to be able to criticize Israel without being called anti-Semitic!
>OK, go ahead.
>Awesome. *burns synagogue*https://t.co/EVa0zxbOGN— neontaster (@neontaster) January 13, 2017
UPDATE (Jan 14, 2017): Buildings in Germany which are still illegal to burn down:
Not hard to see which castes belong to the over-class, and which are untouchables.
i-1
see that assault can't be "racism" because the handicapped white man actually had all the "privilege" during his torturing
— ThatsHowYouGotTrump (@AceofSpadesHQ) January 5, 2017
i-1