Author: The Foreigner

An Odd Fashion Display

Some time back, I did a double-take when I noticed something in a window display outside a fashionable shop in Taipei’s Shin Kong Mitsukoshi Building, near the main train / subway station.  Too bad I didn’t have my camera.

Fortunately, I later saw it again in Taipei’s Warner Village area, where this picture was taken.  The right-hand side of the display couldn’t fit into the shot because the lens wasn’t wide enough, but you get the idea:

Clothing store window display in Taipei Taiwan

Notice anything unusual?  Take a closer look at the newprint wallpaper in the background:

Clothing store window display in Taipei, Taiwan with IRA news story in background

Man, nothing says contemporary fashion better than the IRA, right?

Alright, that’s Monday’s fashion headline.  Here’s Tuesday’s:

Clothing store window display in Taipei, Taiwan with IRA news story in background

OK, I’m spotting a trend here.  Take my word for it, there’s IRA wallpaper for each day of the week, except Sunday.  On the seventh day, the display designers opted for a local story about a typhoon, instead:

Clothing store window display in Taipei, Taiwan with typhoon news story in background

Now admittedly, VERY few Taiwanese window shoppers can actually read the English in the background.  But these are sure strange choices, nonetheless.

i-4

Taiwanese Scientists Create Fluorescent Pigs

Three, to be precise.  Here’s a photo of one of them:   

Pig with fluorescent green genes from Taiwan

Taiwan breeds fluorescent green pig

NTU successfully produces three green fluorescent pigs

Apparently, this has been done before by labs in other countries, but this is the first time that the fluorescence gene has expressed itself throughout the animals’ body.  It’s not really mad scientist stuff, because for genetics studies it’s very useful to have a fluorescence gene inserted into the organism.  When subsequent genes are added, it becomes easy to tell if the insertion worked because the animals stop glowing.  However, the two reports above state that the purpose is for stem cell and regenerative tissue studies.

They don’t really explain how it’s supposed to help in these studies, but here’s how fluorescent mice are used for cancer studies:

A fluorescent mouse under normal light:

Mouse with fluorescent green genes under normal light

And under a black light:

Mouse with fluorescent green genes glowing green under ultraviolet light

Whoa, that reminds me of The Kryptonite Man!  Anyone remember him?

The Kryptonite Man

Anyways, here’s the same kind of mouse with cancerous cells containing a red fluorescence gene:

Mouse with red fluorescent gene glowing red under ultraviolet light

The real pay-off is when tissue samples are taken and viewed under fluorescent light.  Healthy blood vessels glow green, and cancer cells glow red thanks to the added genes:

Mouse tissue sample with normal cells glowing green and cancer cells glowing red under ultraviolet light

They can now have a clear view when studying cancerous tissues, and can better understand what’s going on under different chemotherapy regimes.

I suppose that’s why it’s such a breakthrough that the gene is expressed in EVERY tissue of this new pig.  Heart, lungs, intestines – they’re all green under UV.  It would be difficult to get a good picture of a brain tumor if only the snout glowed.

(Other uses for this technology can be found here.)

Taiwan’s new transgenic pigs bring to mind the fluorescent fish that were first produced here for sale in pet stores in 2003.  I’ve considered buying a few, along with the obligatory "black-lit tank, fluorescent plastic coral and ‘fluorescent fish pellets’ for food."  But I don’t like the idea of going on holidays and bothering other people to take care of them.

Transgenic fish with fluorescent green genes glowing green under ultraviolet light

A Fluorescent Pet

Back in 1990, the possibility of using genetic engineering for entertainment purposes was one of the big themes in Michael Crichton’s novel, Jurassic Park.  Obviously, the concept seems to work for fish, but there probably isn’t a market for green-glowing pet pigs.  These guys will be for medical and scientific use only.

Pig with fluorescent green gene in Taiwan

UPDATE (Jan 14/06): Wandering to Tamsui has a great photo of the three little pigs exposed to UV light.  With tongue planted in cheek, he points out the political significance of their green fluorescence.  (For those not in the know, the party colors for Taiwan’s independence camp and the coalition of its pro-communist rivals are green and blue, respectively.)

UPDATE (Feb 26/06):  I think I have a clearer understanding of why the scientists would want to do this with pigs.  Recall the example of the green fluorescent rat.  Suppose then, that you had a fluorescent green pig instead of a rat, and you injected it with red fluorescent STEM CELLS rather than cancer cells.  Now, you can easily monitor stem cell regeneration of damaged organs, merely by taking tissue samples and exposing them to UV light.

UPDATE (Apr 09/08):  More cool pics on this from a Thai website.

i-8

Pandas for Taiwan: Much Ado About Nothing?

Outsiders may view with incredulity the current controversy in Taiwan about whether to accept two panda bears from China.  No missiles are being fired, no IEDs are exploding, and no suicide bombers are going kabloey.  So what’s the big deal?

Imagine if you will then, if Kim Jong-il of North Korea made an announcement.  He’s just met with Howard Dean, and the two of them have come to an agreement that a couple of extremely rare Korean snow wallabies* will be sent to the National Zoo in Washington, D.C.

American children are delighted.  After all, what could be cuter than a Korean snow wallaby?  National Zoo officials are ecstatic.  What a coup!  How many zoos in the world can boast of such an exotic animal?

There’s a slight snag, though.  The North Koreans correspond with the National Zoo, but refuse to submit any of the required paperwork to the American government (who they denounce as "brigandish imperialists").  Howard Dean and the Democratic Party** calls upon the administration to swallow their pride and break American law – let the snow wallabies in "for the sake of the children".

What would the Bush administration do?

And that in essence is the problem facing Taiwan today.  Should Taiwan flirt with lawlessness for trivialities?  For nothing more important than pandas?

But all of this should be obvious.  Like Howard Dean in the snow wallaby fable, Ma Ying-jeou, head of Taiwan’s pro-communist party, calls upon Taiwan’s PRESIDENT to break Taiwanese law.  Surely Ma, who studied law at Harvard, is cognizant of Louis D. Brandeis’ admonition:

"If the government becomes a law-breaker, it breeds contempt for law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself; it invites anarchy."

Here then, is the big deal:  while the issue of bringing pandas to Taiwan is trifling, the issue of whether Taiwan’s government should break its own laws in order to get them is really much more serious.

Perhaps unaware of Brandeis’ warning, one commenter writes:

"In the end, little children are going to cry because pandas are not coming to Taiwan because (insert explanation to your child)?"

My explanation would be that the pandas are not coming because the Chinese are too arrogant to think that the law applies to them.  I would patiently explain that however much a child may desire candy in a store, he cannot steal it.  Because merely wanting something, be it candy (or panda bears), is not a sufficient reason for breaking the law.

Of course, those that cavalierly run through red lights may have more difficulty in finding an explanation.  And in Taiwan, that sadly constitutes a great many people.

* So rare is this animal in fact, that none have ever been observed in either the wild or in captivity.

** Apologies to Howard Dean and the Democratic Party for comparing them to Ma Ying-jeou and Taiwan’s main opposition party in this What If? scenario.

UPDATE (JAN 15/06):  A vaguely-related Dilbert cartoon.

UPDATE (May 04/06):  Wednesday’s Taiwan News had a good bilingual summary of the issue.  Although the piece had this rather strange translation:

Those in U.S. political circles who lean toward China are known as the “embracing panda faction,” while those that oppose China are known as “dragon slayers.”

Um, aren’t the people making up the "embracing panda faction" usually referred to as "panda-huggers"?

Beijing Slaps Taiwan In The Face While Offering Olive Branch

Saturday’s papers were abuzz with stories about how China had chosen two pandas for the Taipei Zoo.  China demonstrated a nice, Orwellian touch when it claimed that the pandas were meant to be "goodwill presents to the people of Taiwan,"  but simultaneously had a communist spokesman warn that, "…risk is on the rise, as Beijing sees [Taiwan’s constitutional reform efforts] as a provocative step towards formal independence."

There’s a wrinkle amidst all this heartwarming goodwill, though: the government of Taiwan is not permitted to have any say into this generous offer whatsoever.  After all, since there is no Taiwanese government (to China’s thinking), why should any of the standard bureaucratic forms be submitted to a non-existent government?  When Taiwan’s government insisted upon asserting its authority, Lien Chan, former head of Taiwan’s pro-communist party, objected that Taiwan’s government was politicizing the issue and ruining peaceful cross-Strait exchanges.

Yes, shame on you, Taiwan.  When Beijing tells you to jump, you’d better jump.  So saith Lien Chan.

Lien’s successor, Ma Ying-jeou agreed, saying, "It is important to make Taiwanese feel the friendship of China." 

(Golly, I don’t know about you, Mr. Ma, but those two pandas have made me forget ALL ABOUT China’s 800 super-friendly missiles packed with high explosives pointed at Taiwanese homes and schools.)

Not surprisingly, The China Post was also on board.  "Let’s do it for the children," was their position:

"The authorities may cite many reasons why the giant pandas from China shouldn’t be imported, but none of them can beat the one the children of Taiwan have for their presence in Taipei. The children love the giant pandas. They want the cuddly bears to live amongst them…Will the government forget about [exercising its authority] for just this once?"

But The China Post kinda gives away the whole game plan away with that last line.  They want Taiwan’s government to surrender its rights just this once.  Just this once…until the next time comes.

(Tellingly, they don’t call upon China to recognize the authority of Taiwan’s government just this once.)

Perhaps though, I’m being churlish.  Pandas are indeed cute, cuddly things.  I’ll bet the kids sure WOULD love them.  What the Taiwanese government needs is a counter-offer, something generous that it’s willing to freely give to the communist government.  You know, reciprocity.

Taiwan’ll agree to take YOUR pandas without any political interference, if YOU’LL do the same for OUR gift.

But what to give?  A couple of Formosan pangolins just isn’t going to cut it.  How about art?  Everybody loves art.  Maybe a statue for dreary Tiananmen Square?  I was thinking about something along these lines:

The Goddess Of Freedom statue in Hong Kong.

That’d sure look great in bronze.  A little something for China’s "tired, poor, huddled masses, yearning to breathe free."

Your move, China.

UPDATE (JAN 10/06):  A letterwriter to the Mon 9th ed of the Taipei Times suggested keeping the pandas kind of like "human shields" near the presidential building to help deter a decapitation strike (sorry, no link to the letter to the editor is available).  I half-seriously considered the same possibility yesterday, but didn’t include it in the post.  Few things would turn international opinion against Taiwan like caging a couple of panda bears near a military target.  But the letterwriter also proposed renaming the pandas "Democracy" and "Freedom" once they arrive on Taiwan’s shores.  That, I like.

UPDATE (Mar 5/06):  Rather than giving the Chinese a statue of the Goddess of Democracy, Taipei Times columnist Johnny Neihu had another tongue-in-cheek suggestion:

Why don’t we send China a couple of Formosan black bears? They’re "solitary animals" that will "usually not attack unless they are threatened," as the Government Information Office’s Web site on Taiwan’s fauna explains.

I think Beijing has a lesson or two to learn from Taiwan’s bears. I say the only way we should let furry-faced Tuan Tuan (團團) and Yuan Yuan (圓圓) into Taiwan is by giving them political refugee status.

i-1

China’s Impending Meltdown

This, like reports of Zarqawi’s demise, is something that I won’t fully believe until somebody shows me the body.  Nonetheless, the best cure for a bad case of China Fever is some sobering news about some of the problems facing the Central Kingdom.

However, in the absence of hostile action or a major crash, attitudes won’t change here any time soon.  Simple prudence should be enough to motivate Taiwan to diversify its foreign markets.  But short-term profits, a Greater China ideology and the comparative ease of entry for Taiwanese into the China market are all luring too many Taiwanese into thinking that it’s a terrific idea to put all of your eggs into a single basket.

UPDATE (JAN 16/05):  The writer in the above link believes that 2007 is the most dangerous time for China’s banks.  An op-ed piece by William Pesek Jr. in today’s Taiwan News thinks 2006 is the year to watch.  Pesek says that China needs to maintain its current growth rate for the next 15 years in order to avoid a banking crisis, and he thinks that’s unlikely. 

At any rate, I’ll keep what both of them say in mind, but I won’t be holding my breath.

Ringing in the New Year at Taipei 101

Saw King Kong at Warner Village Theaters in Taipei a few weeks ago.  Took this picture of nearby Taipei 101, decorated with lights in a Christmas tree motif:

Taipei 101 lit with Christmas lights in Taiwan

Would have liked a few more, but they turned most of the lights off at 10 pm.  After seeing The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe a few days ago, the same building looked like this with New Years lights:

Taipei 101 lit with Christmas lights in Taiwan

A couple of longer shots:

Taipei 101 lit with Christmas lights in Taiwan

Taipei 101 lit with Christmas lights in Taiwan

A close-up of the tower:

Close-up of the top of Taipei 101 lit with Christmas lights in Taiwan

While taking these, an elderly Taiwanese gentleman asked me what "Bravia" meant.  It looked a little like "bravo", so I said that maybe it was Italian and meant "to cheer".  Later that evening I read in the Taipei Times that Bravia is simply a brand name for a new LCD TV by Sony.

Oops.

Anyways, there’s a couple more pictures of Taipei 101 here.

UPDATE (Jan 04/06):  A famous Taiwanese songstress by the name of A-Mei was late for her appearance at Taipei 101, so she apparently took an ambulance 30 km to reach the New Year’s Eve celebrations.  Now I’m not arguing that it was right, but you do have to admit that it IS kinda punk rock.  I mean, just picture it.  It’s New Year’s Eve.  There’s 400,000 people outside in the cold waiting for the countdown.  The streets are clogged with cars; there’s no place to park.  Up pulls an ambulance.  Bystanders turn their heads.  But instead of white-clad EMV workers emerging, they see a hot, pixie-sized Taiwanese super-star step out and race to the stage in her black mini-skirt and heels.

(The ambulance company was later fined about $6000 US, and A-Mei was given a warning.)

(Sorry, no link available to the story in The China Post.)

UPDATE (Jan 06/06):  For the sake of completeness, here’s the Taipei Times’ treatment of the  story.

i-5

Taiwan’s Birds

The Dec 31/05 edition of The China Post had a link to an English website that has pictures of birds that live in / migrate through Taiwan.  Very nice.  Never knew there was such a thing as a blue robin.  This link’ll take you straight to the art gallery.  Be sure to click on some of the photographs below the paintings…and take a gander.

www.birdingintaiwan.com

(Sorry, no links are available to the original China Post story.)

Semantic Exactitude I: Communists

AsiaPundit favorably reviewed my previous post, but had a small quibble with my referring to Taiwan’s adversaries on the other side of the Strait as "communists".  In truth, I’m not entirely happy with this description myself.  AsiaPundit is right to point out that they ceased to be real communists the day they abandoned the economic model calling for state ownership of the means of production.  One could refer simply to "Beijing" or "the Chinese leadership", but that glosses over the moral nature of the regime.  So what word then, better designates their beliefs and policies?

"Fascist" seems too harsh, because the government in Beijing is not interested in the rigid state control over the economy that the fascists were enamored with.  On the other hand, "authoritarian" is too mild, because the Chinese authorities work very hard to suppress the organizations of civil society (ie: religions) that many authoritarians are content to leave unmolested *.

What’s left?  Demi-fascists?  Para-authoritarians?  Neo-communists?  Maybe the poli-sci folks have a word for them in their arsenal, but it’s bound to be complicated and inelegant.

Which is why I’ve decided to stick to calling the rulers of China "communists".  First of all, it’s what they call themselves, which counts for something **.  Secondly, they still maintain some of the old dogmas, and worship the same gods (ie: Mao), so it’s not entirely inaccurate.  Third, since the mainstream press still uses the term, it’s less confusing for the average reader when I proceed to follow suit.

Finally, it should be recognized that Chinese communism is not alone in being a political ideology that has evolved over time without shedding its original name.  Conservative parties in Europe no longer champion the cause of the nobility, but are still called "conservative".  Liberalism, at least in America, morphed into its current form from what we now call libertarianism, yet no one objects when Thomas Jefferson and Ted Kennedy are both referred to as "liberals".

*  Content to leave unmolested, provided that the organizations in question do not challenge the authority of the political leadership.

**  Blacks have not been called "negroes" for a long time, precisely because blacks now prefer "black" or "African-American".  Still, this line of argument can be taken too far, and few would indulge the Butchers of Beijing if they began calling themselves "democrats".

KMT’s Softness on Defense Causes Officers to Quit Party

It seems that not even KMT stalwarts believe the excuses that the party offers for its blocking of the special arms procurement bill, because an number of Taiwanese military officers have written a letter announcing that they’re taking leave of the party over the issue.*

It’s a little difficult to gauge how big this story is because the number of defecting party members is unspecified.  The chairman of Taiwan’s largest pro-communist party, Ma Ying-jeou, takes it seriously though, saying that:

the KMT sincerely hopes to communicate with those service members who wrote to the defense ministry in order to talk to them about their position on the stalled arms procurement bill.

Is it just me, or is there some kind of veiled threat hidden in that statement somewhere?  As it turns out, the officers in question may have also perceived some kind of danger, because they didn’t sign their names to the letter.

Ma said further:

"No military members, regardless of their political affiliation, should support an arms procurement bill if it is not drafted based on professional assessments and if it cannot genuinely meet Taiwan’s defense needs."

OK, you’re kidding me, right?  Members of the military aren’t capable of making their own "professional assessments" regarding Taiwan’s defense needs?  The Party knows better?

American readers should note that Ma also said that the KMT was opposed to the special arms bill because it is a "cash-for-friendship" purchase plan.  In essence, he claims that George Bush’s armament offer is nothing more than a great, big mafioso protection racket.  Now, if I’m not mistaken, Taiwan was the one that requested these weapons, Mr. Bush was the only leader in the world good enough to offer those weapons, and now Ma and the pro-communists spurn the weapons – and slap Bush in the face to boot!

Good luck with your next weapons request, Taiwan.  You’re gonna need it.

UPDATE (Dec 30/05):  Today’s edition of The Taipei Times had an editorial that pointed out that this episode represents a violation of military neutrality in political matters.  While  the editorialists agree with the officers’ opinion regarding the necessity of the arms sales, they nonetheless take the principled position that the officers should be punished for their foray into the political sphere.

* I’m shocked – shocked! to find that the story appears on the front page of the anti-communist Taipei Times, and is buried on the second last page of the pro-communist The China Post. 

Solution to Taiwan’s Isolation?

It’s no secret that Taiwan has been shut out of international forums for some time.  All the English papers here make note of it, but the China Post has a panacea.  What Taiwan really needs, the editors of The China Post believe, is a "viable cross-strait strategy to end the stalemate."

Viable.  Hoo boy, that’s going out on a limb.  Is there anyone who favors non-viable strategies?

The "viable strategy" that The China Post proposes is that Taiwan should surrender its sovereignty to the communists in exchange for a few scraps thrown to it from the masters’ table.  It may think that the goodwill of tyrants can be bought with the coin of only a little sovereignty, but there it is mistaken.  Taiwan would have to give away the store in order to get anything in return. 

The situation presents an interesting paradox:  as long as Taiwan has its sovereignty, it is cannot gain access to international meetings.  If it trades away its sovereignty it can gain access, but at that stage, it won’t really need it.  For in truth, a non-sovereign Taiwan would have no need for representatives at international meetings at all; for that, a few "appalling old waxworks" appointed by Beijing’s commissars would do.