(Curiously, CAGE had no similar eulogy for Peter Edward Kassig – decapitated by Mohammed ‘Jihad John’ Emwazi & his subhuman confederates. Image from Live Leak.)
UPDATE: Video of CAGE research director Asim Qureshi advocating the fight for human rights Islamofascist terrorism around the globe.
UPDATE #2: Terrorist-sympathizing fifth-columnist Cerie Bullivant from CAGE refuses on no uncertain terms to condemn savage beheadings committed by his fellow Islamofascists.
What a surprise. Just like Barack Obama's statement that the attack on the kosher deli in Paris was just a random attack on "a bunch of folks".
(Just "a bunch of folks", randomly targeted. Jewish. Jewish. Jewish…and Jewish. Notice any pattern? 'Cause if you do, you may be smarter than Barack H. Obama! Image from The Gateway Pundit)
Here's the cartoon that got the Muslim fanatic's panties in a twist. It's a bit objectionable, but frankly, after the Charlie Hebdo massacre, I'm in no mood to cater to the sensitivities of these religious degenerates.
After the initial reaction of incredulity subsided, I decided to subject Mr. Obama’s assertion to pitiless, objective mathematical analysis. What exactly are the odds that 4 Jews could be randomly murdered in Paris by a single killer (as Mr. Obama would have us believe)?
The probability that a random murder in Paris will involve ONE Jew as the victim shall be defined as P1, and is determined by the following equation:
P1 = NJ / NT
Where NJ = Number of Jews living in metropolitan Paris NT = Total number of people living in metropolitan Paris
Given Mr. Obama’s claim that the murders were unrelated, independent events, the probability that 4 Jews were randomly murdered in succession by a single individual is given by the variable Pt:
Pt = 0.000000281 (reduced to 3 significant figures)
The result can be multiplied by 100 to arrive at a percentage:
Pt (%) = 0.0000281%
Thus, there is a 0.0000281% chance that the 4 Jews were randomly killed (and therefore, that the American president is telling the truth).
Or, in starker terms, the likelihood that Mr. Obama is lying through his teeth is 99.9999719%.
The science is settled.
Saying the Paris terrorists randomly picked a Kosher deli is like saying the KKK randomly picked black people to lynch.— David Burge (@iowahawkblog) February 10, 2015
UPDATE: Much hilarity ensues as clueless (and thoroughly incompetent) State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki is unaware that:
Jews (and not Buddhists!) preferentially patronize kosher supermarkets
UPDATE #2: Of course, there is also the possibility that President Obama is not an anti-Semitic liar, and he simply spoke without thinking.
Certainly, if he were willing to admit that the Muslim terrorist who murdered the 4 Jewish shoppers targeted them because of their religion (and not randomly), then the mathematical proof that Mr. Obama is an anti-Semitic liar would be rendered invalid.
What if a white racist with a submachine gun broke into a convenience store in South Central Los Angeles, grabbed seven or eight African Americans who were shopping (maybe there was one Korean) as hostages for the release of some other white racists and then, when attacked, started spewing the N-word while shooting up the place, killing three or four of the African Americans and wounding three or four others, one or two critically.
How would President Obama react?
I suspect he wouldn't say the victims were just "a bunch of folks" who were "randomly" targeted and killed.
"The individuals who were killed in that terrible, tragic incident, were killed not because of who they were, but because of where they randomly happened to be!"
An interesting point in that last link: If the attacks in Paris were so random, why are French soldiers standing guard at synagogues and Jewish schools, instead of at random street corners?
Perhaps they just don't understand the nature of the problem as well as King Putt.
"But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also…Unless of course, someone insults thy mother: In which case, puncheth him mightily in the face." — The Updated King James / Pope Francis Bible (2015)
These fashionable improvements are proving quite popular with the terror-loving Islamofascist set, as a recent still from an anti-Charlie Hebdo rally in London amply illustrates:
UPDATE: In addition to popes and presidents, it is now au courant for judges too, to make excuses for barbarism: German judge rules a Muslim firebombing of a synagogue was mere arson, not terrorism. In Angela Merkel's Germany, burning down Jewish houses of worship is now considered a somewhat disreputable form of political protest, not savagery.
But only if you're a member of the Master Faith, that is. Neo-Nazis don't get away with that kind of horseshit.
As usual, science may have the answer. Recent advances in stem-cell technology have raised the possibility that even an EUnuch might one day be able to grow a pair.
Finally got around to reading Saturday’s edition of the Taipei Times, and my jaw hit the floor when I saw a one paragraph piece on Albania. WTF? Muslim groups in Albania are opposing plans to erect a statue in honor of their country’s most famous daughter: Mother Teresa.
At this point, I’m thinkin’ it’s one of those April Fool’s Day stories. Gotta be. But no, Reuters reported it as well:
…Muslim groups in [the Albanian city of] Shkoder rejected the local council plan for a Teresa statue, saying it "would offend the feelings of Muslims."
[…]
"We do not want this statue to be erected in a public place because we see her as a religious figure," said Bashkim Bajraktari, Shkoder’s mufti or Muslim religious leader.
…men in one Shkoder bar said they would prefer a monument to an Albanian fighter who blew himself up in order to avoid being captured by enemy Serbs…
So, Muslim clerics are opposed, as are the faithful. At least, the pub-crawling beer-drinkers among them, anyways.
Now, what’s wrong with this picture? Democratic Taiwanese can’t TAKE DOWN down statues of dictators, while Muslim Albanians can’t PUT UP statues of saints?*
This one’s filed under ‘Islamofascism’, although I realize that’s a bit of an exaggeration. What I SHOULD do is create a new category called, "Muslim Lack of Graciousness Towards Other Religions," and put the post there.
But I’m much too lazy to do all that. Sue me.
* My first post on the failed efforts to remove Chiang Kai-Shek and Chiang Ching-Gwoh statues from Taiwanese military bases can be found here. The second is here.
UPDATE: ABC News places a more positive spin on the story, stating that the city’s largest Muslim group has given the proposed bust of the Roman Catholic nun their blessing, despite the objections of three smaller organizations. Still, the other groups ARE busy doing their best impression of communist China, warning everyone that social peace could be shattered by green-lighting the "provocative" memorial.
"If [Naser Khader] becomes the Minister of Foreigners or Integration, why don’t we send out two guys to blow up him and his ministry?"
When he heard the news, Akkari gave a little smile and replied: Oh yeah? Prove it.
Well, Ahmed, you’re busted. Turns out you were being secretly taped in an automobile when you said it. The tape’ll soon be part of a French documentary.
Akkari’s reaction to the news? Backpedallin’ time!
"If they think I have said that, then I must have been jesting. […] You also need to understand, from the context, that I wasn’t being serious because I usually don’t say stuff like that – not even in jest. But sometimes things happen."
So your excuse is that you were just joking? About what? About whether the moderate would actually GET a cabinet post? Or about whether you would only need TWO of your terrorist buddies to blow up the building?
As you might guess, Danish journalists could just SMELL the blood in the water:
Interviewer: Do you understand that it might be hard for Danes to accept that it’s not okay to make caricatures of Muhammed, but that it’s okay to threaten – in jest – to kill a Danish politician? (emphasis added)
Akkari: That’s a wrong conclusion and comparison to make of this.
Interviewer: Isn’t it very natural? You’ve been very angry, very offended that your prophet has been offended, but now you’ve – in jest – threatened to kill a politician.
There’s more, but you get the idea. Word is that the Danish "Islamic Faith Community" organization is now looking for a new spokesman.
