Tag: Islamofascism

Because Lowly Infidels Must Always Pay Obeisance To Members Of The Master Faith™

Al Jazeera employee Hashem Said lays down Sharia Law to all you dirty kuffar out there: it's haram to show the face of murderous Muslim cunt Tashfeen Malik:

Little did Said know at the time, but Malik's family may indeed be on trial. For it strains credibility to claim that mama Farook and the rest of their clan were unaware of Syed's bomb lab and 12 pipe bombs, while there are also questions about mama Farook's membership in an Islamic caliphate society.

A day after these tweets, the Farook family recognized their legal vulnerability and wisely lawyered up.

We don't care about appeasing the dictates of your dirty terrorist culture, Said.

YOU adapt.

Tashfeen Malik: Muslim terrorist who, along with her husband, Syed Rizwan Farook, slaughtered 14 people during the December 2, 2015 terrorist attack in San Bernardino.

UPDATE (December 9, 2015): Don't look now, but papa Farook was placed on terror watch list two days ago.

UPDATE #2: Mama Farook lands on terror watch list a day later.

i-1

Yo Obama, kinda hard to talk about “keeping people safe” when your Muslim peeps are shooting up America

Really glad I waited a day or two before commenting on the San Bernardino massacre. Unlike some other folks…

Oops!

BTW, there are new claims that Obama's peeps (the San Bernardino terrorists) received $28,500 prior to their Christmas party massacre.

Which if true, puts a high-powered assault rifle bullet through the whole "Lone-Wolves" theory.

UPDATE (December 9, 2015): Syed Farook's received $28,500 not from overseas, but from an online lender.

Regardless, the care he took to remove or destroy evidence of his electronic trail suggests he was attempting to hide his contacts from authorities.

UPDATE (December 16, 2015): How the Obama administration shitcanned investigations into American Muslim terrorist groups.

America’s Worst Mothers: Tashfeen Malik & Linda Stasi

On the one hand, Tashfeen Malik slaughtered 7 civilians and wounded 10, leaving her 6 month-old daughter an orphan.

While on the other hand, Linda Stasi of the NY Daily News slimes victims of terror by likening them to their murderers.

I shit you not:

Say, is this a game anybody can play?

Tashfeen Malik (Muslim terrorist) and Linda Stasi (bottom-feeding Daily News columnist): Linda Stasi is JUST AS BAD a mother as Tashfeen Malik.

Apparently so. Where's child protective services when ya need 'em?

UPDATE:

 

Recall that Linda Stasi argued there were only THIRTEEN innocent victims.

UPDATE #2: Opportunistic reptile Linda Stasi once sued New York City for $2 million after she tripped over a police barricade.

Call me crazy, but perhaps she shouldn't have stepped over that barricade in the first place. Linda, maybe you should try that next time.

Her lawsuit claims:

Stasi's injuries, the complaint says, left her "severely injured and damaged, rendered sick, sore, lame and disabled." Additionally she suffered "severe nervous shock and mental anguish, great physical pain and emotional upset."

She was also unable to malign massacre victims for several days afterwards.

UPDATE #3: The Foreigner isn't a gun guy, and is receptive to reasonable gun control measures. But I get where Schlichter's coming from:

UPDATE (December 7, 2015): Linda Stasi's record of blaming the victims of Muslim terrorism.

UPDATE (December 10, 2015): That time Donald Trump joined Linda Stasi in blaming the victims of Muslim terror:

i-1

The Department Of Homeland Security. Fire. Them. All.

Re: That Muslim terrorist cunt from the San Bernardino massacre

Heckuva job, DHS!

For [Tashfeen Malik's] visa application [to live in the United States], the address she listed in her Pakistani hometown, ABC News discovered today, does not exist. [Emphasis added]

Barack Hussein Obama on the December 2, 2015 Islamofascist terrorist attack on San Bernardino: 'I offered my thoughts-and-prayers. What more do you want from me?'

UPDATE: What if Barack Obama's Department of Homeland Security is actually trying to murder Americans instead of protect them?

[Tashfeen] Malik, 27, belonged to an educated, politically influential family from Karor Lal Esan in Layyah district. Malik Ahmad Ali Aulakh, one of her father’s cousins, was a provincial minister from 2008-13.

Residents said the Aulakh family is known to have connections to militant Islam.

As they like to say at Obama's Department of Homeland Security, nobody who lies about their address and has connections to militant Islam could be a bad person!

UPDATE (December 6, 2015): All is well, remain calm, everything is under control:

At least 72 employees at the Department of Homeland Security are listed on the U.S. terrorist watch list, according to a Democratic lawmaker.

UPDATE #3: Obama's FBI is really on the ball, too.

UPDATE #4:

UPDATE (December 7, 2015):

UPDATE (December 9, 2015): The original title of this post was, Time For Public Hangings At The Department Of Homeland Security.

Musta been really tired and angry.

Public hangings? Oh my, really?

Not gonna apologize for being angry, but that was a bit over the top and inflammatory.

For the record, there will be NO public hangings over these lethal fuckups at Obama's Department of Homeland Security.

(Nor, one suspects, will there be so much as a single private reprimand, either…)

UPDATE (December 15, 2015):

UPDATE (December 16, 2015):

i-1

Alternate Daily News Cover

Daily News Headline: 'OBAMA ISN'T FIXING THIS', with image of San Bernadino terrorist Tashfeen Malik and sub-headline: 'Department of Homeland Security grants residency to murderous Muslim cunt who slaughters Americans.'

(Image from the Democratic Underground)

You know how much Barack Obama's "thoughts and prayers" are worth if he continues to allow Muslim terrorists to enter the States?

“Fuckin’ nothin’.”

UPDATE: The comedy routine which seems to have inspired the prayer-shaming movement:

i-1

So Apparently, Prayer-Shaming Is Now A Thing

Hmm. Democrats must have the next election in the bag, so clearly they don't need votes from the drooling, inbred Jeebus-lover crowd:

Nevertheless, as an atheist myself, I can sympathize with the desire for solutions over platitudes. And so in the spirit of that, I make a simple proposal following the terrorist attack at San Bernardino:

End ALL Muslim immigration. NOW.

Because the time for meaningless platitudes is indeed over.

UPDATE: Just tracked down one more of those jerks who offers "thoughts and prayers" during mass casualty events.

I mean, what a total asshole, amirite?

Barack Obama offering thoughts and prayers after various tragedies.

And for the sake of completeness, this monster's latest violation of all that is good and politically-correct:

"Our first order of business is to send our thoughts and prayers to those who have been killed."
— Obama on the San Bernardino massacre (Dec 3, 2015)

UPDATE #2: Some thoughts on the prayer-shaming campaign:

The coordinated attack [on offering "thoughts and prayers" for victims & their families] seems to have three goals: One, to simply bait and troll religious people, Two, to show how trite and silly common people are with their second-hand sentiments (and how elevated the critic of such sentiments is), and Three, that while the rightwing can only offer "thoughts and prayers" in response to a mass shooting, leftwing politicians offer action…

UPDATE #3:

UPDATE (December 6, 2015):

i-1

ISIS Sympathizer At The China Post: “Leave ISIS Alone!”

If there's a murderous, anti-Western, anti-democratic government to be found, Joe Hung will be there to lick its boots. Or sandals, as the case may be.

Barack Obama should stop his Crusade against ISIS now, demands Hung:

Obama still has time to reconsider [his] new Crusade, lest he should repeat President Bush's folly by getting the United States mired ever more deeply in the Middle East quagmire.

A competent historian would never say Obama was engaged in a Crusade, for the simple reason that Obama's not trying to recover formerly Christian lands in the Middle East.

(It helps, when one accuses another of launching a Crusade, to have some familiarity with the actual DEFINITION of the word…)

Moving along, ISIS's grotesque little apologist in Taipei asserts the Islamofascist group cannot be fought because it's invincible:

Even supposing the new Crusaders succeeded in toppling the IS caliphate, suicidal terrorism could never be stopped. Caliph al Baghdadi has ordered a jihad. There would not be any lack of mujahideen. Hundreds of thousands of his followers are willing and ready to die in a holy war against the Western imperialists who they believe are launching the new Crusade.

No, 'fraid not. A caliph's religious and political legitimacy rests necessarily upon his control over TERRITORY. Remove his control over land and his legitimacy vanishes. After which, the orders of a phony caliph carry no weight.

Speaking of al-Baghdadi's legitimacy, supermajorities in Middle Eastern countries have a unfavorable opinion of ISIS and regard al-Baghdadi's self-proclaimed position as illegitimate. Read into it what you will that an agnostic Confucian like Joe Hung finds al-Baghdadi more legitimate than the vast majority of Muslims do.

Chart showing ISIS support among Arabs in various Muslim countries.

(Chart showing 85% of all Middle Easterners regard ISIS with disfavor.)

Finally, Joe Hung suggests that because ISIS is invincible, it should be left alone to bring peace to the region, the way the Ottoman Caliphate did in years previous:

There was no trouble in the Middle East while the caliphs of the Ottoman Empire ruled it for more than 400 years.

This is all highly unconvincing, since according to Islamic law, a caliph is REQUIRED to wage at least one war every year against Infidel nations.

An ISIS caliphate is therefore likely to create A GREAT DEAL of trouble outside the Middle East, regardless of what happens inside. (Just as the Ottomans made incessant war on Eastern Europe and the Balkans.)

And as for his fanciful prospects of ISIS pacifying the Middle East, Joe Hung forgets the presence of 6 million Jews and many more million Shiites in the region, whom ISIS is unlikely to leave unmolested.

Joe Hung of Taiwan's China Post: 'Allahu ackbar, O Children of Pigs and Apes! My favorite parts of ISIS’s Mohammedan program are the rapes, genocide, torture, decapitations, immolations, crucifixions, slavery...and probably the rapes!'

Um, you said "rapes" twice.

6 Yazidi women cower in a corner in fear from 2 ISIS terrorists. Below, Joe Hung of Taiwan's China Post says: 'Hey, you two! Quit hoggin' all that moist Yazidi slave cooch!'

POSTSCRIPT: Joe Hung invents "facts" to satisfy his narrative:

As a matter of fact, one result of the Crusades, during which Jews were massacred by Crusaders in a pogrom, was the birth of Zionism, which finally triumphed with the creation of Israel. [Emphasis added]

Comrade Historian is apparently unaware that Zionism (like many other forms of nationalism) was largely a product of the 19th century.

i-3

Taiwanese Cry Foul Over Obama Shout-Out

The other day Barack Obama publicly praised Taiwan for its humanitarian contributions for refugees from the Syrian and Iraqi civil wars, leading Taiwanese who would normally not agree with each other to react with anger and alarm at being placed into ISIS's crosshairs.

First, Chinese nationalists at Taiwan's China Post:

…Obama's statement has not generated the [favorable] traffic that might be expected on [Taiwanese] social media. When it is mentioned, Obama's Taiwan mention is…greeted with a "why us?" analysis.

The U.S. president knows full well that naming Taiwan in such a way will, to a degree, put Taiwan on the terrorists' map…

And second, Taiwanese nationalists at the Taipei Times:

US President Barack Obama naming Taiwan as one of the US’ partners in the global battle against terrorism might have come across as a nod to the nation’s aid to Syrian refugees to some, but his remarks at the East Asia Summit in Kuala Lumpur were not only hypocritical, but have put the nation in danger of being targeted by Muslim extremists.

[…]

As with any talks at the international level, the two parties [KMT & DPP], intentionally or otherwise, have sent a clear message not only to IS, but also to Obama: “Keep Taiwan out of your fight.”

I'm gonna zag where readers might expect me to zig, and defend Obama on this one. (Or rather, not so much defend him as to place the blame elsewhere — on Ma Ying-jeou and Taiwan's KMT government.)

Taiwan's humanitarian contributions to alleviate the Syrian crisis are presumably not on some sort of top-secret budget, but are a matter of public knowledge in Taiwan as well as parts of the Middle East. The China Post elucidates the composition of Taiwan's aid:

The nation donated prefabricated houses, LED lamps and medical supplies worth nearly US$10 million in recent years in humanitarian assistance through the U.S. and relevant countries to refugees and other people affected by terrorism and war in the Middle East, according [to Taiwan's Ministry of Foreign Affairs].

It seems to me that if the Taiwanese government wanted its donations kept on the q.t., the onus was on it to communicate this wish — clearly & firmly — to the U.S.

It certainly had ample time to do so…YEARS of time, in fact.

So yes, Obama should be faulted for not understanding how ISIS's attacks on one U.S. ally (France) might cause nervousness on the part of a lesser player like Taiwan. But that does not absolve Ma Ying-jeou's administration from the responsibility it had for informing the American government about its desire to avoid the attention of the monstrous Islamofascist organization, ISIS.

Amidst all the finger-pointing at Barack Obama, the KMT's failure in this matter should not forgotten, either.

POSTSCRIPT: I've even seen a "Downfall" parody on this subject. Not knowing Chinese, I can't speak to its quality or lack thereof.

UPDATE: The China Post whistles past the graveyard:

Also, IS does not consider Taiwan an enemy. The monetary and humanitarian support Taiwan gives the American-led coalition is insignificant. The new caliphate feels no need to retaliate against Taiwan.

How do you know that? You got a secret hotline to Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi?

And if so, do you believe everything he tells you?

Widows-And-Orphans Flock To ISIS

Despite its Muslim radicalization problem, America to enlarge its pool of ISIS recruits:

A new report by Congress says more than 250 Americans have attempted to join ISIS, and one in four of them is from Minnesota, many of them former refugees. [Emphasis added]

Letting more in sounds like stupid stuff.

UPDATE (November 29, 2015): The Taipei Times ran an opinion piece falsely equating opposition to Western settlement of Syrian refugees with the wartime internment of Japanese-Americans.

What the writer of the piece fails to understand is that during war, one does not invite foreign nationals from hostile countries to settle in one's territory because of the obvious security threat. What is less obvious is that Japanese-Americans — not foreign nationals, but American citizens — required internment. (Particularly since German-Americans and Italian-Americans were not subject to the same requirement.)

I contend that citizens of Western nations have a right to have a say in their countrys' immigration policies, and are well within their rights to reject immigration of refugees who are anti-Semitic, anti-Christian and anti-atheist.

Finally, it should also be noted that Taiwan has not offered to settle Syrian refugees in its territory, and that some of Taiwan's politicians resist immigration from Communist China on similar grounds (namely, due to national security concerns as well as the pro-unification attitudes presumably held by such immigrants).